"SYSTEM" Benefits Available to Education & Churches?

     The following information on this web site is quoted from Chapters 21 and 22 of Harrison's book titled:  "Successful Children Almost Effortlessly (Through Self-Management)."

FOR EDUCATION: 

     The Harrison System can eventually change a great many things for the better but change in any form often creates resentment. We dislike change unless it's obviously pleasurable or the alteration brings relief from discomfort. On the other hand, if the deviation from the normal causes discomfort it will be fought aggressively. When the change involves outright pain, all battle restraints are removed.
     You may expect the most disparaging remarks from the controllers of public education in the following order of intensity:  teachers' unions, school administrators, and colleges of education. This is the natural order of discomfort expected. You know and the administrators of the teachers' unions also know that there will be little need for their services when instructors are independent contractors in full control of a lucrative business. Even though they should heartily approve such obvious betterment for their clients, you can almost depend upon hearing dire warnings about the "dog-eat-dog" competition generated by such an insidious scheme; or how such a teacher is a traitor to his colleagues and is certain to corrupt pupils; and finally the death of public education probably will be flaunted to scare parents into fits of frenzy.
     If people were only allowed a pause to think rationally, they would realize how nonsensical such statements are. For example, nothing can destroy public education in the United States - it's too firmly entrenched. Whatever is done to public education can only make it better -surely it can't be made much worse, only more expensive for taxpayers and more lucrative for controllers.
     The government must try to educate its citizens. Welfare, crime and other social problems caused by citizens who are gradually becoming less and less able to do much of anything for themselves are eliminated only with free men educated in self-reliance. So let's recognize the old scare tactic of "public school funerals" for what it is - the convenient hog wash of frightened controllers who think they may lose their lucrative but useless jobs.
     Now that we understand that public education is here to stay, let's see if we can't discover some way to improve it. In the author's last two books he couldn't say enough good things about the possible implementation of a "voucher system" for public and private education. Since then, more facts have come to light and now the author views it with disfavor. Yet, it is the best of the other bad solutions.
     The voucher system, in its simplest terms, is merely a certificate given to parents by their school district which may be presented to the school of the parents' choice with the expectation of receiving a free education for their child. The school accepting such a document is paid for the services rendered from public funds. Thus, parents are permitted to select the school of their choice and have the school reimbursed by the taxpayers. Oh, if it only were this simple!
     The trouble with vouchers is the usual difficulty one may expect whenever the government is involved - constant meddling in affairs that shouldn't concern the government in any way. Instead of merely handing the certificate to an eligible parent for presentation to the school of his choice, the government insists on attaching all kinds of conditions to its use. For example, the Constitution prevents church schools from racial and religious discrimination. Federal, state, and local laws specify what subjects will be taught, where, and how long. Lawmakers provide the snooping inspectors necessary to assure compliance. At last the ever-widening authority of government takes over the school operation. A recipient school relying exclusively upon vouchers would find itself completely at the mercy of the bureaucrats. This situation would and should be intolerable to most school owners, and even the administrators of any participating public school in the voucher program.
     A much better disbursement program of public funds for education purposes lies with a tax deduction for schooling. Of course, this suggestion is unusable for the poor, since they pay no taxes from which a deduction could be taken. Therefore, the voucher remains the only alternative for these people who need to eliminate the debilitating effects of child-management the most. But, before a voucher system can be acceptable, government meddling must be eliminated.
     Ah, ha! Enter the Harrison System private school (Click on www.behaviormodsuperkids.com/PvtSch.html). When all comers can be accepted on an unrestricted basis, with classrooms enlarged as needed, and self-reliance methods used, what could be better for the purpose? What more needs to be said? Well, perhaps a lot!
     First of all, we have really put the cart before the horse in this chapter, just as all voucher advocates have done in the past. Instead of prattling on about the need for vouchers and tax deductions for school expenses, let's start H-S schools as an alternative. Each one must entice parents into wanting to enroll their child. It's your job, with the author's assistance, to make it all happen. Once Harrison System private schools are established and producing the product of which they are obviously capable, the poor will demand a voucher system. And, those who aren't poor may be content to pay for what they want instead of demanding a subsidy from their government. Soon the cost of education to taxpayers can reduce itself to a mere dribble instead of its former torrent. Furthermore, everything would be gradually established through attrition and competition, rather than by some painful upheaval such as the immediate establishment of a voucher system would produce.
     An excellent place to begin would be with the bottom of the barrel.  Just imagine how may resident schools, orphanages, juvenile delinquent schools, and foster homes exist throughout the country, which are awaiting the self-management techniques available with the System. What a proving ground this would provide for self accountable methods! Is there a skeptic anywhere who would doubt the ability of the Harrison System after obvious success was earned with such youngsters" Think of the tax deduction!
     However, one caution must be mentioned at this point. Observers of even obvious success can be fooled into believing something different when the facts are sufficiently twisted by the selfish who fear for their own personal interests. So don't be misled by statements professing that the Harrison System is useful only as a crutch for the maladjusted child. This was effectively used in the past when the self accountable Harrison System was turned into a technique to pay children for proper behavior. The improper conduct was either ignored or explained away. After approving it for use in classrooms of twelve or less handicapped youngsters, it was labeled "behavior modification." Quite naturally, this did the trick. What proud (management) parent or teacher would ever want to use such a program with a normal child? Now, if you fall for such nonsense, someday you might expect your child-management-trained offspring to be working for the so-called handicapped person who has been educated with self accountable methods.
     Although the executives of teachers' unions rightly have cause to fear the loss of their jobs, and some public school administrators theirs, and a few colleges of education may experience a drop in teacher enrollment, yet, truthfully, the controllers of public education won't really suffer to the extent they may believe now, because everything should happen through normal attrition and competition over a long period of time.
     With such a gradual-attrition program functioning, public school classrooms should slowly become available for leasing by the private school sector. As a public-school teacher retires, or pupils are lost to the private schools, the schoolroom should be rented to provide income for taxpayers. Almost painlessly, the public schools could be converted into prosperous and productive "publicly-private" schools, instead of what they are now.         
     There will also be cries, especially from some controllers, that the Harrison System Institute (which is explained in the book) is trying to maneuver itself into a position of power and control over all education in the United States and even the world. As a thinking person, you should recognize this as merely another ploy by someone who is about to lose his or her own position of power and control. Such a happening is not only impossible but also undesirable for the aims of the Institute.
     First of all, immediate legislation would not only be invited but probably passed at any indication that anything even resembling control was being attempted. And second, does it seem logical to you that an institute organized specifically for the purpose of promoting self accountability and eliminating the insidious effects of management would use tactics that are just the opposite?
     Now that you have been shown exactly how the Institute will operate, you should realize that every associated private school has complete and absolute control over itself and every H-S teachers has complete and absolute control over himself. The Institute exists to serve them and never the reverse. Suggestions are accepted as profitable or rejected as unsuitable. This is the essence of self accountable methods. Besides, would you rather the control of education was left in the hands of those who have it now, or placed in the hands of parents who should know what's best for their children?
     Next to God, only parents know what is best for their children. Perhaps the teachings of both can be combined with the church school. The next chapter should let us see how.

TO HELP THE CHURCH:

     One could believe that God wanted His subjects to have a blind faith in a supreme being which would naturally prevent them from losing it. But evidently this was not His desire since He gave humans a free will to do as they pleased. Moreover, He introduced Satan to be certain everybody has a chance to choose between right and wrong.
     Now, when children are trained through child-management methods, they become conditioned to follow the instructions of the manager - whether it's God or Satan. Since the child isn't given the training to exercise his judgment, and this doesn't mean some choices among several suggestions made by an adult, his decision-making capabilities are not developed. Thus, the child becomes an adult who can be easily converted to God's ways or he can be just as easily led away from them.
     We oldsters have a habit of saying that the children of today have no blind faith in the Lord and thus have fallen away from His ways. However, this needn't be true so long as some devout person is always in attendance for proper guidance. But that is impossible! Therefore, everyone must eliminate self-destructive child-management training and replace it with self accountable methods. Children who think for themselves love God.
     God's principles are beyond logical refute (if they weren't, He could have deprived us of our reasoning powers). All the self-reliant person requires is a proper explanation of them to become a permanent disciple who can't be swayed from His teachings. The Harrison System is the perfect tool for the job. It becomes the bait to attract and the hook to hold. The obvious joy of System use is sufficient bait and the self-reliant product it generates is the right hook to hold the converted, first through logic and then through faith. So let's see how this can be easily accomplished by both the small and the large church of any denomination.
     All churches should form self-help workshops for the parents in their congregations. This can be an easy task since each church has all of the ingredients for great initial success. For example, most churches have adequate facilities; they have enough (eager) parents, since all are now probably using the hateful child-management; most congregations contain some talented or experienced teachers; and finally, churchmen should have a great desire to create people who want to think for themselves - God's way.
     Once a self-help workshop for parents is in operation, the church should consider starting a private school using the Harrison System, or - if they already have a school, converting it. Probably the workshop's parents will insist upon this. And, as you gain new workshop recruits, their children will also enroll in the H-S private school. Thus, you will have a built-in mechanism to increase school growth. Yet, this is only the start of wonderful things for the church.
     Instead of mixing religious instruction into the regular school day, defer this until the hour following. Although this suggestion may seem inappropriate to the devout, it could enhance God''s work. Perhaps you would like to see why.
     First, by not mixing religion with the customary subjects, you will attract all persons to your private school. This in turn can serve to build attendance for the religious instruction offered after school. Remember, children talk! Trust children of the church to entice others - if there is a reason.
     Second, without religious instruction, your private school should qualify for vouchers to help the poor. If the government isn't too unreasonable with its mandates, your school could do a great amount of good for the people needing it the most. But if you shut the door to this possibility by mixing religious instruction, you may regret it later. Just imagine how you might feel to be able to reach the street children with your program of self-accountability. And, to know that someday their lives might be changed for the better just because they had an opportunity to attend your school.
     Third, and perhaps most important, when the private school instructor needs to mix religion with the regular subject matter, it becomes much more difficult to acquire such a specialized teacher whenever a replacement is necessary. The practical way to go is as suggested in the chapter on private schools (or on the web site cited above). Utilize the independent contractor as an instructor for your classrooms. This will eliminate many many problems, and it will give your school the competitive advantage it deserves. In fact, never again can the tax-supported schools compete with you as long as they continue to use child-management methods.
     Fourth and last, your non-religious private school could do an excellent job of recruiting children for your Sunday School.  Again, when the children of your church talk about the delights of a Harrison-System Sunday School while attending your private school, you may be surprised at the results. You may have the whole family attending your church. This might be assured if you are willing to make the change suggested in the next paragraph.
     Why don't you think about implementing self accountable techniques into your regular church services with adults? Instead of having to be a superpreacher, entertainer, and perhaps high-pressure salesman to recruit and hold your congregation, how would you like to replace this with System methods that might work a lot better? Now of course, this is merely conjecture since the suggestions that follow are merely that and nothing more. Maybe they have been tried and are working well now but not to the the author's knowledge. The question for you to consider, if you are a pastor or influential churchman, is:  What could possibly work in my church? Let's consider a few suggestions and see.
     Appoint  or elect a (System) banker, from the membership, who will be in charge of the church's "System bankbook for the recording of "Church Credits." Next, select volunteers to become student assistant pastors who in turn will select the rest of the congregation as pupils. Now, whenever the pastor explains some of God's principles before the whole assemblage on Sunday, the congregation cant be turned loose for reinforcement study in their groups. Tests given at the end of each study period earn church credits with the student pastors being paid a bonus of ten percent of whatever their pupils earn. Items that are motivational to such adults could be auctioned to create unbelievable incentive on a completely self accountable basis. Now let's see what this could do for your church.
     The first and most important thing your church would have is extensive involvement of the congregation. No member would ever again be just a passive listener. Instead of just the opportunity to become a Sunday School teacher or Bible-class leader who in the past earned only prestige for the job;  instead of (suffering) constant horseplay or maybe abuse from the class;  instead of (suffering) a lecture by the pastor for misbehavior;  all (of the congregation) will be self accountable through credits and paid in something tangible for honest effort. Prestige will be earned through one's own (obvious) initiative. Any member of the congregation could aspire to a student pastorship or a teaching contract to present God's lesson. Instead of merely belonging to a church, membership would become an integral part of their church as self accountable methods were used to assure faith in oneself and in God.
     The next chapter will let you see what the results for society must be when enough Harrison-System children become self-reliant adults.